Apple Wins Last-Gasp Reprieve From Brazil App Store Changes - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple Wins Last-Gasp Reprieve From Brazil App Store Changes

A Brazilian federal court has overturned an antitrust ruling that would have required Apple to allow third-party payment systems in the App Store within 20 days.

app store awards 2022
The initial ruling, issued on November 26, came in response to a 2022 complaint from Latin American e-commerce platform MercadoLibre. The regulator had ordered Apple to remove restrictions on alternative payment systems and allow developers to market different payment options for in-app purchases, threatening daily fines of $43,000 for non-compliance.

But Judge Eduardo Santos da Rocha Penteado of the 14th Federal Civil Court on Thursday called the original decision by Brazil's competition regulator (Cade) "disproportionate and unnecessary."

In his decision, Penteado acknowledged that the measures demanded by Cade would "change, in a sensitive and structural way" Apple's business operations. He said that the technical complexity of the required changes and the global regulatory landscape, particularly similar decisions in the European Union, warranted a more thorough discussion.

The decision came hours after reports emerged of Apple appealing the original order, with the company arguing that the required changes were too complex to implement within the given time frame.

While the injunction has been overturned, the broader antitrust investigation into Apple's App Store practices will continue. Cade is expected to appeal the court's decision, and Apple could still eventually be required to implement changes to its App Store policies in Brazil.

The case follows similar regulatory challenges Apple faces globally, including a recent €1.8 billion fine from the European Commission over music streaming app restrictions. Apple has maintained throughout that the Brazilian regulator's demands would threaten user privacy and security.

(Via 9to5Mac.)

Popular Stories

App Store vs EU Feature 2

Apple Loses EU Fight Over App Store Gatekeeper Label

Wednesday July 8, 2026 1:54 am PDT by
Apple's challenge against the EU's designation of its App Stores and iOS platform as "gatekeepers" was dismissed by Europe's top court on Wednesday, reports Reuters. "The General Court dismisses Apple's actions regarding its designation as a gatekeeper in relation to the App Store and iOS," the Luxembourg-based tribunal said.Apple took its case to Luxembourg's General Court in 2024 after the...
european union eu

Google Fined $1 Billion by EU for Search Bias and App Store Restrictions

Thursday July 23, 2026 5:39 am PDT by
Google was today fined €890 million ($1 billion) by the European Union for breaching antitrust rules with regard to its search and Google Play store services. The European Commission found that Google had broken the Digital Markets Act (DMA) by using its dominant position in the search market to favour its own services, like shopping and hotel deals, over those of rivals. The Commission ...
apple bitcoin app scam

Apple Responds to Lawsuit Over Fake Bitcoin Wallet Scam in App Store

Monday July 27, 2026 6:00 am PDT by
Apple is facing a new lawsuit from three customers who allegedly lost a combined $1.8 million after falling victim to a fake Bitcoin wallet app in the App Store, according to a complaint filed in California federal court on Friday. The complaint alleges that Apple violated California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act and other laws by failing to adequately review and monitor apps distributed...

Top Rated Comments

wbeasley Avatar
22 months ago

Yeah, it's easy for Apple to just buy the currpt Brazilian judge instead of complying with county's regulations.
and your proof that Apple bought off a judge? :)

just because the outcome doesnt align with your opinion...

there's a legal term for spreading misinformation.
And even social media posts need to adhere to laws. Or risk legal action... :)
And media hosts can also face legal issues by allowing posts like that to remain online.

By all means have your opinions, offline.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
oofio2461 Avatar
22 months ago
I believe it's your device, your choice. Once you buy it, it's your hardware, which you can modify as much as you like.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
22 months ago

Yeah, it's easy for Apple to just buy the currpt Brazilian judge instead of complying with county's regulations.
You know Apple bought the judge how? Where's your evidence?
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
22 months ago

I believe it's your device, your choice. Once you buy it, it's your hardware, which you can modify as much as you like.
Why does this principle not apply to a calculator then? Or a car? Or a robot vacuum? Why is it not a violation of basic rights for those to not offer easy ways to modify the software out of the box? It’s because there is no fundamental human right that says a company cannot make a closed-system product, even a computer.

The truth is you do indeed have the choice to do what you want with it after you’ve bought it—as in, just like with a calculator/car/vacuum, you are free to try to hack it and you won’t go to jail. Apple is also free to not continue offering support for your hardware if you violate the terms under which you chose to buy it. Freedom goes both ways.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
22 months ago

I always wonder if money changes hands when this happens.
Yes, Apple continues to pay developers. Apple pays employees. Apple pays taxes. Developers pay taxes with the money they made. People buy stuff. Some people buy Apple's stuff. The earth continues to turn.
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
spazzcat Avatar
22 months ago

I believe it's your device, your choice. Once you buy it, it's your hardware, which you can modify as much as you like.
you don't own the software.
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)

🔗 Related Apple News & Rumors

Stay updated with the latest Apple ecosystem news and verified rumors