Apple Addresses Meltdown and Spectre in macOS Sierra and OS X El Capitan With New Security Update - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple Addresses Meltdown and Spectre in macOS Sierra and OS X El Capitan With New Security Update

Along with macOS High Sierra 10.13.3, Apple this morning released two new security updates that are designed to address the Meltdown and Spectre vulnerabilities on machines that continue to run macOS Sierra and OS X El Capitan.

As outlined in Apple's security support document, Security Update 2018-001 available for macOS Sierra 10.12.6 and OS X El Capitan 10.11.6 offers several mitigations for both Meltdown and Spectre, along with fixes for other security issues, and the updates should be installed immediately.

meltdownspectre
Apple addressed the Meltdown and Spectre vulnerabilities in macOS High Sierra with the release of macOS High Sierra 10.13.2, but older machines were left unprotected. Apple initially said a prior security update included fixes for the two older operating systems, but that information was later retracted.

Spectre and Meltdown are two hardware-based vulnerabilities that impact nearly all modern processors. Apple in early January confirmed that all of its Mac and iOS devices were impacted, but Meltdown mitigations were introduced ahead of when the vulnerabilities came to light in iOS 11.2 and macOS 10.13.2, and Spectre was addressed through Safari updates in iOS 11.2.2 and a macOS 10.13.2 Supplemental Update.

Spectre and Meltdown take advantage of the speculative execution mechanism of a CPU. As these use hardware-based flaws, operating system manufacturers are required to implement software workarounds. These software workarounds can impact processor performance, but according to Apple, the Meltdown fix has no measurable performance reduction across several benchmarks.

The Spectre Safari mitigations have "no measurable impact" on Speedometer and ARES-6 tests, and an impact of less than 2.5% on the JetStream benchmark.

Many PCs with Intel processors have been facing serious issues following the installation of patches with fixes for Meltdown and Spectre, but these problems do not appear to impact Apple's machines.

Related Forum: macOS High Sierra

Popular Stories

HomePod mini and Apple TV Sage

New Apple TV and HomePod Mini Are 'Nearly Ready' to Launch, New Siri Remote Also Rumored

Sunday May 31, 2026 8:47 am PDT by
New models of the Apple TV 4K and HomePod mini are "nearly ready to go," according to the latest word from Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos. Both devices have been ready "for months," but Apple is holding off on launching them until the more personalized version of Siri is available, he said. "I am told the hardware for the next Apple TV...
Apple Foldable Thumb

First 'Confirmed' iPhone Ultra Color Allegedly Revealed in Leaked Image

Monday June 1, 2026 4:39 am PDT by
Apple is expected to launch its first foldable iPhone later this year. Rumors suggest the "iPhone Ultra" will come in two color options, and a leaker shared an image today that allegedly shows one of them. Posted on Weibo by the Chinese leaker known as Ice Universe, the image purportedly offers a first glimpse of Apple's foldable in white. The device is believed to have entered early mass...
Meta Ray Ban Glasses

Apple Glasses Reportedly Launching in 'Late 2027' With These Features

Sunday May 31, 2026 9:21 am PDT by
Apple is now aiming to release its first smart glasses in "late 2027," according to the latest word from Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. Meta Ray-Bans He previously said that Apple planned to begin shipping the glasses by early 2027, but he said the product has faced development delays. The glasses will feature "oval-shaped cameras, unique colors, and multiple frame styles," according to Gurman....

Top Rated Comments

109 months ago
How about iOS 9 or iOS 10? Lots of devices stuck there.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
109 months ago
Can we get the same for iOS 10?
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
zorinlynx Avatar
109 months ago
I wonder how reliable Apple's patches are given that Linus Torvalds has condemned the patches ('https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/21/192') submitted to the linux kernel by Intel:




Linus is never one to mince words...
That's one thing I love about him. He loves Linux and he wants to make it the best system it can be. He doesn't bother with political correctness or being nice. If someone writes bad code, he lets them know, harshly. Everyone who works with him knows not to take things personally.

We need more people like that in QC and management positions at companies like Apple. Steve Jobs was much the same way.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
109 months ago
So, no fixes for Yosemite...
Is it possible to just get El Capitan or Sierra instead of the useless High Sierra...?
Yes, fortunately you can still get those installers:
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT208202 (Sierra)
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT206886 (El Capitan)
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
109 months ago
i guess my ibook g4 will be left vulnerable...
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
109 months ago
I shouldn't really reply to someone that joined in October 2017 only to post criticism (not a single positive post).
However, I will point out that one could say all security measures are "half-hearted" in that they address an issue (or a group of them) when many others are either in the pipeline or about to be discovered.
If you cannot get to terms with this fact of computing life then perhaps you should give up computers altogether.

I hate to point out the obvious, but when I am not happy with a service provider I usually move to one that I perceive to be a better one. Have you considered this as an option?
Since when does being a forum member for a short period of time exclude my opinion? I've been in IT for 28 years. I started with Linux and I've been a Mac user for 7 years now. I'm heavily invested in them. Switching isn't A) cheap nor B) is my opinion not the source of the problem.

I am asking for Apple to just be more transparent. As an example, pick the last year of the OS release your running that isn't the current OS, then add up all of the discovered vulnerabilities in the following years and those are the holes you are running with. e.g. a 2015 OS has 540+ holes Apple will -never- fix. So patching spectre and meltdown isn't throwing anyone a bone.
https://www.cvedetails.com/product/15556/Apple-Iphone-Os.html?vendor_id=49

Cisco is not a perfect company but their EOL policy is transparent and certainly works better than Apples. They could learn something from them.
https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/eos-eol-policy.html

Asking Apple to do better is not picking on them, I'm a very concerned customer. I had to dump a fully functional Mac mini because Apple stopped producing patches. That latest iMessage crash bug, not fixed in Sierra. I now have a new mac.

---

One last thing, I joined in October because of precisely this issue. I want to raise awareness so that Apple improves their response, not continue with it's current fog of a policy.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)

🔗 Related Apple News & Rumors

Stay updated with the latest Apple ecosystem news and verified rumors