Apple-Led Rockstar Consortium Sells Remaining Patent Portfolio for $900 Million - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple-Led Rockstar Consortium Sells Remaining Patent Portfolio for $900 Million

by

San Francisco patent company RPX today announced it is purchasing more than 4,000 telecommunications patents from Rockstar, an Apple-led consortium that previously acquired the patents from bankrupt Nortel Networks. The sale will net Rockstar $900 million, a fraction of the $4.5 billion the conglomerate of technology companies paid for the entire patent portfolio in 2011, although many of the high-value patents were previously dispersed to the consortium's members.

rockstar-logo
As reported by The Wall Street Journal, RPX confirmed its subsidiary RPX Clearinghouse, will license the patents to a syndicate of technology companies that include Google and Cisco Systems. RPX is making the patents available with non-exclusive licenses to all syndicate members, whose funds helped pay for the purchase. RPX also will license the patents to outside companies under fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms, and members of the Rockstar consortium will retain licenses for the patents.

Rockstar was formed in 2011 when Apple, BlackBerry, Ericsson, Microsoft, and Sony joined together to purchase patents from bankrupt communications company Nortel. The consortium purchased 6,000 patents, with 4,000 patents being held under the Rockstar umbrella and the remaining 2,000 patents being distributed to member companies.

The sale of the patents follows Rockstar's rather unsuccessful attempts to license the patents. The consortium also filed patent infringement lawsuits against a variety of technology companies with Google and Cisco recently settling their disputes for undisclosed amounts. As part of this patent sale to RPX, Rockstar has agreed to drop its existing suits against Samsung, LG and HTC.

Top Rated Comments

macs4nw Avatar
152 months ago
It sounds like they cherry picked the best patents out of the lot and then sold off the rest. However, they still retain access to all of the licenses included in the purchase.
Seems like a win/win.
Or perhaps just cutting/mitigating their losses, and moving on…..
Score: 4 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Eraserhead Avatar
152 months ago
Or perhaps just cutting/mitigating their losses, and moving on…..

Or perhaps a bit of both ;).
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
152 months ago
The fact that Rockstar and its members (Apple included) keep can continue to use the patents is a good thing, since this should prevent any legal actions later. The only question I have is how they do an ROI on something like this. I mean, they spent $4.5 billion on the patents. They sell some of them and get $1 billion back, so is the ROI the reduction in lawsuits? Given all the other issues they have gone to court for, I am sure they can stick a big number on that, but $3.5 billion?

Basically just curious, since from the outside it looks like they may not invested well on this one, but I am probably missing something.

It sounds like they cherry picked the best patents out of the lot and then sold off the rest. However, they still retain access to all of the licenses included in the purchase.
Seems like a win/win.
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
cjmillsnun Avatar
152 months ago
Or perhaps just cutting/mitigating their losses, and moving on…..

That was my thinking given the below...



The sale of the patents follows Rockstar's rather unsuccessful attempts to license the patents.
Score: 1 Votes (Like | Disagree)
152 months ago
The fact that Rockstar and its members (Apple included) keep can continue to use the patents is a good thing, since this should prevent any legal actions later. The only question I have is how they do an ROI on something like this. I mean, they spent $4.5 billion on the patents. They sell some of them and get $1 billion back, so is the ROI the reduction in lawsuits? Given all the other issues they have gone to court for, I am sure they can stick a big number on that, but $3.5 billion?

Basically just curious, since from the outside it looks like they may not invested well on this one, but I am probably missing something.
Score: 1 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

Apple Event Logo

Apple Working on All-New Operating System

Wednesday July 29, 2026 11:39 am PDT by
Apple is developing an all-new operating system that is essentially a mix of tvOS, watchOS, and iOS, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. In a report this week, he said the operating system will feature a grid of icons, widgets, and apps, along with customizable clock faces. The new software platform is intended for Apple's long-rumored smart home hub. With built-in facial recognition,...
imac video apple feature

Apple Made Its Second-Biggest Acquisition Ever This Year

Wednesday July 29, 2026 12:03 pm PDT by
Apple this year acquired Israeli startup Q.ai for close to $2 billion, according to the Financial Times. That would make this Apple's second-biggest acquisition ever, after it paid $3 billion for the popular headphone maker Beats in 2014. This is also the largest known Apple acquisition since the company purchased Intel's smartphone modem business and patents for $1 billion in 2019. Q.ai...
Dynamic Island iPhone 18 Pro Feature

iPhone 18 Pro: Twelve Changes Coming to Apple's Next Flagship

Thursday July 30, 2026 3:43 am PDT by
We're less than two months out from the launch of Apple's premium next-generation smartphone lineup, and while we're not expecting a dramatic change in terms of functionality, there are still several enhancements rumored to be coming to the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max. One thing worth noting is that Apple is reportedly planning a major change to its iPhone release cycle this year,...

🔗 Related Apple News & Rumors

Stay updated with the latest Apple ecosystem news and verified rumors