Apple Hit With $634 Million Verdict in Apple Watch Blood Oxygen Patent Lawsuit - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple Hit With $634 Million Verdict in Apple Watch Blood Oxygen Patent Lawsuit

A U.S. federal jury has ruled that Apple owes medical technology company Masimo $634 million for patent infringement related to the blood oxygen-sensing technology in the Apple Watch, reports Reuters. Apple will appeal the verdict.

apple watch series 6 blood oxygen monitoring 1
"We are pleased by this outcome, and appreciate the time and attention given to our case by the court and the jury," said Masimo in a press release." This is a significant win in our ongoing efforts to protect our innovations and intellectual property, which is crucial to our ability to develop technology that benefits patients. We remain committed to defending our IP rights moving forward."

"Over the past six years (Masimo has) sued Apple in multiple courts and asserted over 25 patents, the majority of which have been found to be invalid," an Apple spokesperson told Reuters. "The single patent in this case expired in 2022, and is specific to historic patient monitoring technology from decades ago."

The patent dispute led to a ban on U.S. sales of Apple Watch with the blood oxygen feature in December 2023. Apple was able to temporarily continue selling the Apple Watch models while an interim stay was in place during an appeal, but the ban was reinstated as of January 18, 2024, and Apple addressed the issue by immediately launching sales of models with the feature disabled in software.

Apple Watch models in the U.S. remained unable to support blood oxygen monitoring for over a year and a half before Apple introduced a workaround in August 2025 with blood oxygen data being processed and displayed on a paired iPhone rather than on the Apple Watch itself, a change that satisfied U.S. Customs regulators that had been charged with enforcing the original ban.

Apple's workaround did not sit well with Masimo, which filed another lawsuit in an attempt to overturn the U.S. Customs decision and once again prevent Apple from selling Apple Watch models with the blood oxygen feature in the U.S., but there has yet to be a ruling in that lawsuit.

Related Roundup: Apple Watch 11

Popular Stories

3 4 24 Sport Band Refresh Feature

Sketchy Rumor Claims Apple Watch Series 12 Could Introduce Sensor in Band

Friday July 3, 2026 8:54 am PDT by
The Apple Watch Series 12 could ship with a new health sensor built directly into one of its bands, according to a sketchy rumor from a known leaker. The leaker known as "Kosutami" says the sensor will be injection-molded into a silicone band, and only a silicone band, apparently because Apple has not yet solved how to embed similar hardware in bands made from other materials. No detail was...
watchos 27

Siri AI Comes to Apple Watch in watchOS 27 Beta 3

Monday July 6, 2026 1:24 pm PDT by
With watchOS 27 beta 3, Apple added support for Siri AI and the Siri app, so Apple Watch users can now use the features right from their wrist. Apple said Siri AI would be coming to the watch back when watchOS 27 was first introduced, but the feature wasn't live until now. The Dynamic App Grid that pops up when the Digital Crown is pressed displays the Siri app in the center, and the...
Apple Watch Series 10 Jet Black

Apple Watch Series 13 Rumored to Mark the End of an Era

Wednesday July 8, 2026 1:29 pm PDT by
While the Apple Watch Series 12 is still a few months away, a new rumor suggests that next year's Apple Watch Series 13 will mark the end of an era. According to a recent post from a known leaker on the Chinese social media platform Weibo, the Apple Watch will be receiving a major redesign next year, and this will apparently include a new way of attaching bands to the watch. As a result, the ...

Top Rated Comments

9 months ago

Slimy company that deserves nothing. They don't care about human health, just profits from old technology and lawsuits.
Masimo is a real company that has been operating with these kinds of sensors - and more - long before Apple started this kind of monitoring. I was managing introduction of new systems for patient monitoring, which was using sensors from Masimo (among others) at a new hospital just a couple of weeks ago so they're a large, worldwide company in their sector.

Apple was looking into licensing from Masimo, but chose not to. Instead they hired employees away from Masimo and designed something that was close enough to what Masimo had that several instances has sided with them - and Apple failing with their argument "this is a watch, not a patient monitor. Thus we can use what's described in the patents". I dislike patent trolls more than most and has done so for many decades, but this is not one of these.

Of all the IP cases Apple has had, this is one of the very few where I side with the other side.
Score: 48 Votes (Like | Disagree)
9 months ago
It would have been a lot cheaper for Apple - and therefore consumers - had they just paid for the licensing fee, like everyone else.
Score: 26 Votes (Like | Disagree)
9 months ago

just profits from old technology and lawsuits.
If you don't defend your patents, you lose them.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
9 months ago
Couldn’t Apple just buy Masimo for less?
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
9 months ago

If you don't defend your patents, you lose them.
That's trademarks, not patents.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
CWallace Avatar
9 months ago

It would have been a lot cheaper for Apple - and therefore consumers - had they just paid for the licensing fee, like everyone else.
Indeed. While I have heard unsubstantiated claims Massimo wanted over $100 per watch, claims based on FRAND patents say this would have been closer to $10-20 per watch.

Evidently this judgement works out to just under $15 per infringing watch.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)

🔗 Related Apple News & Rumors

Stay updated with the latest Apple ecosystem news and verified rumors