Apple Accuses Epic Games of Wanting a 'Free Ride' - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple Accuses Epic Games of Wanting a 'Free Ride'

Apple and Epic Games are facing off in Australia among other countries, and this week, Apple accused ‌Epic Games‌ of seeking a "free ride" on its platform. In a statement to MacRumors, Apple said that it will continue to fight for a ruling that respects its intellectual property.

app store blue banner epic 1

"Epic is now asking to free ride on Apple's platform and dismantle every safeguard we've put in place to protect users and developers -- a request that goes well beyond the Court's ruling. We will continue to seek an outcome that respects our intellectual property and protects the safe, secure experience consumers and developers expect from our platform."

For context, ‌Epic Games‌ sued Apple in Australia way back in 2020, accusing the company of violating competition laws. In August 2025, Australia's federal court partially sided with Epic, deciding that Apple's rules prohibiting sideloading and alternative payment methods did indeed violate the Competition and Consumer Act.

The court hasn't decided on how it will address Apple's anti-competitive behavior, but ‌Epic Games‌ wants the court to permit sideloading on iPhones in Australia, with no fees paid to Apple.

Apple believes that Epic's request goes beyond what the court declared in its August ruling. While the judge said Apple's anti-sideloading rules violated competition law, the ruling also acknowledged that Apple has the right to be paid for its technology, and that Apple's security and privacy concerns are a valid reason to prohibit third-party app stores.

Apple and ‌Epic Games‌ had a case management hearing on October 17 ahead of additional hearings that will determine the measures that are put in place to address Apple's alleged violation. ‌Epic Games‌ has submitted its proposed remedies, and the court will now consider the arguments made by ‌Epic Games‌ and Apple.

An initial remedies hearing is set to take place in December, but the full relief hearing has been postponed until March 2026 to give Apple more time to consider and respond to what ‌Epic Games‌ has proposed.

While no decision has been reached, the initial ruling suggests that Apple could be forced to allow sideloading and alternate payment options in Australia, similar to what's happened in the European Union with the Digital Markets Act. Apple is concerned that the court will reach a decision that could create privacy and security concerns for consumers and expose them to increased risk.

‌Epic Games‌ has claimed that Fortnite will eventually be returning to iOS in Australia as a result of the ruling.

Popular Stories

Google Logo Feature Slack

Google and Epic Abandon Injunction Modification Request, Clearing the Way for Rival Android App Stores

Wednesday July 15, 2026 5:02 pm PDT by
Google and Epic Games this week withdrew their joint motion to modify an injunction requiring Google to support third-party app stores in Google Play. The two companies abandoned the request after it became clear the court was unlikely to allow it. Google is now bound by a permanent injunction issued in October 2024 requiring it to allow alternative app stores on Android devices. In a court...
fortnite brazil

Fortnite Returns to iPhone in Brazil as Epic Games Store Launches

Thursday July 30, 2026 1:11 pm PDT by
Epic Games today said that the Epic Games Store can now be downloaded on iPhones in Brazil through the Epic Games website. In its announcement, Epic Games complained about the third-party store installation process, which requires nine steps and includes screens warning customers about downloading apps outside of the App Store. Apple is imposing a 9-step install flow for alternative app stores ...
Apple Event Logo

Apple Working on All-New Operating System

Wednesday July 29, 2026 11:39 am PDT by
Apple is developing an all-new operating system that is essentially a mix of tvOS, watchOS, and iOS, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. In a report this week, he said the operating system will feature a grid of icons, widgets, and apps, along with customizable clock faces. The new software platform is intended for Apple's long-rumored smart home hub. With built-in facial recognition,...

Top Rated Comments

10 months ago
Apple is 100% correct. Objectively. Apple risked billions in R&D and Epic just wants to take what Apple built and profit.
Score: 39 Votes (Like | Disagree)
10 months ago
I want the choice to be able to load whatever i want in my devices.

Either stop your hypocrisy (its for your safety, not for our profits) censorship or allow proper sideloading.

Again, I dont understand apple's customers that insist in having LESS options, which conveniently works in favor of Apples coffers and worse, they insist in taking that option away from the ones that do want that option.

If I paid over 1 thousand dollar for a device, I should be able to do with it whatever I like, not what Tim Apple and Jobs ghoul spirit decides.

Edit thanks for confirming my point.
Score: 37 Votes (Like | Disagree)
DocMultimedia Avatar
10 months ago
Epic does want a free ride. It's rather simple. But the legal system takes time. Hopefully the pointless Epic stuff fades away in the near future.
Score: 27 Votes (Like | Disagree)
10 months ago
Eventually apples 30% fees will crumble. Instead of a decade of financial engineering via stock buybacks and sticking developers and customers with excessive fees they should have been innovating.
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
10 months ago
Apple wanting a free ride off its customers is what's going on here.

Pay for the hardware. Pay for your services subscriptions. Pay a percentage of everything you spend on apps. All to Apple.

The rest at least is justifiable, because Apple is genuinely offering a service for money. But apps are not that. And make no mistake, it is your money Apple is taking here in the end, not Epic's.

Why should a free app get a completely free ride, less annual developer fees, while, let's say, a AAA quality mobile game going for $60 would owe Apple 15~30% of all sales?

That's as much as $18 from every person paying for the app, straight into Apple's pocket, so what you're really getting after the Apple tax is barely more than $40 worth of actual app.

Simply publishing an app for a computing platform — what the iPhone and iPad purport to be — had never come with fees attached before companies like Apple started locking down hardware you've already paid for, preventing you from running the software you want without paying even more fees.
Score: 18 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Sophisticatednut Avatar
10 months ago

Apple is 100% correct. Objectively. Apple risked billions in R&D and Epic just wants to take what Apple built and profit.
Meh. They sell the developer subscription. They get their due.

If epic makes good products that runs great on iPhones it will sell more iPhones.

Try making content on Epic's platform and check how much they take.
Well they take a 3.5% cut after your make a million if you use their Unreal engine.

And any Epic Games Store payments they pro process, developers will pay a 0% revenue share on their first $1,000,000 in revenue per app per year, and then the regular 88%/12% revenue share when they earn more than that…

So currently it’s 0% a year for every million… kind of a sweet deal.

https://store.epicgames.com/en-US/news/new-epic-games-store-webshops-and-revenue-share-update
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)

🔗 Related Apple News & Rumors

Stay updated with the latest Apple ecosystem news and verified rumors