EFF Pressures Apple to Completely Abandon Controversial Child Safety Features

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has said it is "pleased" with Apple's decision to delay the launch of of its controversial child safety features, but now it wants Apple to go further and completely abandon the rollout.

eff logo lockup cleaned
Apple on Friday said it was delaying the planned features to "take additional time over the coming months to collect input and making improvements," following negative feedback from a wide range of individuals and organizations, including security researches, politicians, policy groups, and even some Apple employees.

The planned features include scanning users' iCloud Photos libraries for Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM), Communication Safety to warn children and their parents when receiving or sending sexually explicit photos, and expanded CSAM guidance in Siri and Search.

In its response to the announced delay, the EFF said it was "pleased Apple is now listening to the concerns" of users, but "the company must go further than just listening, and drop its plans to put a backdoor into its encryption entirely."

The statement by the digital rights group reiterated its previous criticisms about the intended features, which it has called "a decrease in privacy for all ‌‌iCloud Photos‌‌ users, not an improvement," and warned that Apple's move to scan messages and ‌‌iCloud Photos‌‌ could be legally required by authoritarian governments to encompass additional materials.

It also highlighted the negative reaction to Apple's announced plans by noting a number petitions that have been organized in opposition to the intended move.

The responses to Apple's plans have been damning: over 90 organizations across the globe have urged the company not to implement them, for fear that they would lead to the censoring of protected speech, threaten the privacy and security of people around the world, and have disastrous consequences for many children. This week, EFF's petition to Apple demanding they abandon their plans reached 25,000 signatures. This is in addition to other petitions by groups such as Fight for the Future and OpenMedia, totalling well over 50,000 signatures. The enormous coalition that has spoken out will continue to demand that user phones—both their messages and their photos—be protected, and that the company maintain its promise to provide real privacy to its users.

The suite of Child Safety Features were originally set to debut in the United States with an update to iOS 15, iPadOS 15, watchOS 8, and macOS Monterey. It's not clear when Apple plans to roll out the "critically important" features or how it intends to "improve" them in light of so much criticism, but the company still appears determined to roll them out in some form.

Popular Stories

Aston Martin CarPlay Ultra Screen

Apple's CarPlay Ultra to Expand to These Vehicle Brands Later This Year

Sunday February 1, 2026 10:08 am PST by
Last year, Apple launched CarPlay Ultra, the long-awaited next-generation version of its CarPlay software system for vehicles. Nearly nine months later, CarPlay Ultra is still limited to Aston Martin's latest luxury vehicles, but that should change fairly soon. In May 2025, Apple said many other vehicle brands planned to offer CarPlay Ultra, including Hyundai, Kia, and Genesis. In his Powe...
Apple Logo Black

Apple Just Made Its Second-Biggest Acquisition Ever After Beats

Thursday January 29, 2026 10:07 am PST by
Apple today confirmed to Reuters that it has acquired Q.ai, an Israeli startup that is working on artificial intelligence technology for audio. Apple paid close to $2 billion for Q.ai, according to sources cited by the Financial Times. That would make this Apple's second-biggest acquisition ever, after it paid $3 billion for the popular headphone and audio brand Beats in 2014. Q.ai has...
Apple Logo Black

Apple's Next Launch is 'Imminent'

Sunday February 1, 2026 12:31 pm PST by
The calendar has turned to February, and a new report indicates that Apple's next product launch is "imminent," in the form of new MacBook Pro models. "All signs point to an imminent launch of next-generation MacBook Pros that retain the current form factor but deliver faster chips," Bloomberg's Mark Gurman said on Sunday. "I'm told the new models — code-named J714 and J716 — are slated...
14 inch MacBook Pro Keyboard

Apple Changes How You Order a Mac

Saturday January 31, 2026 10:51 am PST by
Apple recently updated its online store with a new ordering process for Macs, including the MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iMac, Mac mini, Mac Studio, and Mac Pro. There used to be a handful of standard configurations available for each Mac, but now you must configure a Mac entirely from scratch on a feature-by-feature basis. In other words, ordering a new Mac now works much like ordering an...
Apple MacBook Pro M4 hero

New MacBook Pros Reportedly Launching Alongside macOS 26.3

Sunday February 1, 2026 5:42 am PST by
Apple is planning to launch new MacBook Pro models with M5 Pro and M5 Max chips alongside macOS 26.3, according to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman. "Apple's faster MacBook Pros are planned for the macOS 26.3 release cycle," wrote Gurman, in his Power On newsletter today. "I'm told the new models — code-named J714 and J716 — are slated for the macOS 26.3 software cycle, which runs from...

Top Rated Comments

Nuvi Avatar
58 months ago

I don’t know how apple are seen as the bad guy for trying to improve reporting and protection here.

The EFF don’t seem to be proposing any alternative solution.
You honestly believe private companies should start monitoring their users? You want Apple Police, Microsoft Police, Google Police etc. of gathering info for some other private organisation so they can use it to their own purpose? Shouldn’t we leave hunting down the criminals to governments and law enforcement agencies and not to some shady groups who are not governed by the laws like law enforcement?
Score: 98 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Porco Avatar
58 months ago

I don’t know how apple are seen as the bad guy for trying to improve reporting and protection here.
Literally in the article you responded to:

”for fear that they [the plans] would lead to the censoring of protected speech, threaten the privacy and security of people around the world, and have disastrous consequences for many children.”
Score: 87 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Saturn007 Avatar
58 months ago

Ah, the slippery slope fallacy.
It's no fallacy. It's how freedoms and privacy are eroded, and how authoritarian, fascist governments come to power.


When you receive this much backlash over a feature intended to protect kids from sexual abuse material and prevent adults from distributing said material, you know you’re doing something right.
When Apple receives this much backlash over a feature intended to protect kids from sexual abuse material and prevent adults from distributing said material, you know it's doing something wrong.

There. Fixed it for you!
Score: 63 Votes (Like | Disagree)
DBZmusicboy01 Avatar
58 months ago
Tim Cook is acting like the bad guy from Titanic who used the little girl to get into the lifeboat ? that’s how I feel Apple is trying to do. To use children as an excuse when in reality it’s for other reasons they want to spy on us.
Score: 38 Votes (Like | Disagree)
benh911f Avatar
58 months ago
“warned that Apple's move to scan messages and ‌‌iCloud Photos‌‌ could be legally required by authoritarian governments to encompass additional materials.”

They keep saying “authoritarian” governments in these articles. I can’t think of any government anymore that’s NOT authoritarian.
Score: 34 Votes (Like | Disagree)
matrix07 Avatar
58 months ago

1: privacy issue if it means children are protected. Those who question the privacy asspect of the issue I would have to question why because do they not want children to be protected?, therefore a persons privacy is more important than the protection of children? That concept is appalling to me. A childs protection comes before my privacy.
For a million times: it’s not Apple job to do this!

Want to protect our children? Either donate fund to FBI team who’s dealing with this issue or talk secretly to Congress to pass a law requires ALL who store our photo to scan for CSAM. Apart from these GTFO of my devices!

I’m a paying customer. I don’t like being point finger at ‘Hey! Let me check you. You COULD be a criminal’. This is not a way to treat your loyal customer.
Score: 27 Votes (Like | Disagree)