Apple in 2011 Considered Collecting a 40% Fee From Some Subscription Apps - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple in 2011 Considered Collecting a 40% Fee From Some Subscription Apps

Apple once considered taking a 40 percent cut from some subscription apps, according to documents shared today by the House Judiciary Committee (via Bloomberg).

appleappstorefeesemails
Back in March 2011, Apple's services boss Eddy Cue emailed three other executives and suggested Apple should "ask for 40% for the first year only," but that a "few deals" needed to be worked out for Apple to "see what is right."

One of the executives, Jai Chulani, wrote back that Apple could be "leaving money on the table" asking for 30 percent in the first year of subscriptions.

At the time, the emails referred to apps that offered digital content like Hulu on the Apple TV rather than apps running on iPhone and iPad, though Apple had launched App Store subscriptions in February 2011.

Apple ultimately decided to take a 30 percent cut from subscriptions purchased through the ‌App Store‌, and later reduced that rate for longer running subscriptions. Today, when customers sign up for a subscription within an app, Apple collects 30 percent for the first year, and 15 percent for the second year and all subsequent years.

Apple CEO Tim Cook during his testimony at today's antitrust subcommittee meeting emphasized that Apple has not changed its ‌App Store‌ fees since the ‌App Store‌ launched, and has in fact lowered them, referencing the 15 percent cut.

Ahead of the antitrust meeting, Apple also commissioned a study suggesting Apple's ‌App Store‌ fees are in line with the fees collected by other digital marketplaces and service providers.

Popular Stories

app store blue banner epic 1

Apple Asks Supreme Court to Pause Epic Games Case Ahead of App Store Fee Ruling

Monday May 4, 2026 4:08 pm PDT by
Apple today filed an emergency application with the Supreme Court, asking for a stay on App Store fee calculations while it waits to hear whether the Supreme Court will weigh in on the latest developments in its legal battle with Epic Games. Apple argues that without a stay, it will face irreparable harm. Apple says it will have to litigate the fundamentals of its business model with the...
rave app

Apple Sued for Pulling Co-Viewing App Rave From the App Store

Thursday May 7, 2026 10:41 am PDT by
Rave, a cross-platform service that lets users watch movies and TV shows together, today filed a series of antitrust lawsuits against Apple after Apple removed the Rave app from the App Store in August 2025. According to Rave, Apple cited "unspecified allegations of fraud and vague concerns about content moderation" when pulling the app. Rave alleges Apple targeted the service because Rave...
Liquid Glass App Store Feature

Apple Working on Plan to Allow AI Agent Apps on the App Store

Wednesday May 13, 2026 11:02 am PDT by
Apple is looking into ways to better support apps that include AI agents and AI coding capabilities in the App Store, reports The Information. Apple is designing a system that would maintain its security and privacy standards while allowing for AI app features, but details on how the system will work are unavailable. Apple started blocking updates for some popular vibe coding apps in March...

Top Rated Comments

boss.king Avatar
76 months ago

30% is perfectly fair. 40% is not.
Can I ask you to explain how you came to that judgement? What makes 30 so much more acceptable than 40? Why not 25? Why not 60? Are you just drawing an arbitrary line in the sand because it's what we're used to, or is there some calculation you've run here?
Score: 58 Votes (Like | Disagree)
japanime Avatar
76 months ago
Amazon takes up to 65 percent (yes, you read that right) from independent publishers of books sold through the Kindle store.

I'm not suggesting that by "only" taking 30 percent (or 40 percent) is by any means fair. But Amazon is getting away with highway robbery.
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
boss.king Avatar
76 months ago

because it's the industry standard that Sony, Nintendo, and Microsoft has adopted with their stores.
But it's the industry standard in part because that's where Apple set it. If they had originally been debating between 40% or 50%, would you be arguing that 40% is perfectly fair but not 50?
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Apple_Robert Avatar
76 months ago
Much ado about nothing, seeing how that did not come to fruition. Not sure why it is story worthy 9 years after the suggestion.
Score: 19 Votes (Like | Disagree)
LN3000 Avatar
76 months ago
I don't see how this is really much of a story. One person suggesting something doesn't mean it reflects company values. I could suggest Mickey Mouse becoming president, but that doesn't mean all of America wants Mickey Mouse to be president (although....)
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
76 months ago

But it's the industry standard in part because that's where Apple set it. If they had originally been debating between 40% or 50%, would you be arguing that 40% is perfectly fair but not 50?
No. Playstation Store existed in 2006 and took 30%. Apple App Store launched in 2008.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)

🔗 Related Apple News & Rumors

Stay updated with the latest Apple ecosystem news and verified rumors