SoftBank May Be Selling Arm, But Apple Isn't Interested - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

SoftBank May Be Selling Arm, But Apple Isn't Interested

SoftBank, the company that owns chip designer Arm Holdings, is exploring options that could include a full or partial sale of Arm, according to rumors, but Apple isn't interested in purchasing the company.

applesilicon
In a report on Nvidia's possible interest in Arm, Bloomberg says that SoftBank approached Apple to see if Apple might want to buy Arm. The two companies reportedly had preliminary discussions, but Apple does not plan to pursue a bid because of Arm's licensing requirements and possible regulatory concerns.

The two firms had preliminary discussions, but Apple isn't planning to pursue a bid. That's because Arm's licensing operation would fit poorly with Apple's hardware and software business model. There may also be regulatory concerns about Apple owning a key licensee that supplies so many rivals. An Apple spokesman declined to comment.

Apple licenses Arm technology for the A-series chips in its iPhones and iPads, and is also planning to use Arm chips in future Macs, with a transition starting later this year.

According to Bloomberg, Nvidia has approached SoftBank to discuss a potential deal for Arm, but other bidders could potentially emerge. SoftBank is also considering a public stock listing as an alternative to a private sale.

A potential sale to Nvidia or another company would not likely have a major impact on Apple or Apple's licensing of Arm technology because of the regulatory oversight and requirements that would accompany such a deal.

Companies that use Arm technology at the current time also would not be in favor of a deal that does not include assurances that Arm's instruction set will continue to be available for equal licensing opportunities.

Popular Stories

apple silicon feature joeblue

Apple Silicon Exec Explains Mac Mini AI Demand and On-Device Future

Monday July 6, 2026 5:10 am PDT by
Apple's Mac mini and Mac Studio have become the machines of choice for running AI agents, according to Doug Brooks, Apple's senior product manager of Apple silicon. Brooks made the claim while discussing Apple's chip strategy in a newly published interview with The Deep View conducted just prior to WWDC 2026 in June. Brooks says that the company has seen "incredible demand" for the two...
apple silicon 1 feature

Apple Silicon is Taking an Unexpected Turn

Friday July 10, 2026 7:24 am PDT by
Ever since the Mac switched from Intel processors to Apple silicon starting in 2020, each generation of M-series chips has included higher-end Pro and Max variants. If a recent report proves to be accurate, though, that streak will be coming to an end. According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple will be releasing a regular M6 chip, but it has no plans to offer higher-end M6 Pro and M6 Max...
M6 Pro M6 Max Mockup

Here's Why Apple is Reportedly Skipping M6 Pro and M6 Max Chips

Sunday July 12, 2026 8:12 am PDT by
According to Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, Apple will be releasing a regular M6 chip, but it has no plans to offer higher-end M6 Pro and M6 Max chips. In his Power On newsletter today, he said the reason for this break in tradition is AI. "Apple had been planning major neural-processing upgrades for the M7 family and ultimately decided those improvements were important enough to justify...

Top Rated Comments

JulienBerthelot Avatar
79 months ago
If I were Intel, man would I buy that company... Saves them from becoming (maybe, who knows) irrelevant.
Score: 25 Votes (Like | Disagree)
JPack Avatar
79 months ago

What stops another company from buying ARM and then quadrupling (or more) the licensing fees? What alternatives would Apple have at that point?
1. ARM offers perpetual licensing for their ISA.

2. Apple uses ARMv8-A ISA (see #1). But they do not license processor core designs. Apple designs their implementation in-house.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
4jasontv Avatar
79 months ago

What stops another company from buying ARM and then quadrupling (or more) the licensing fees? What alternatives would Apple have at that point?
It's not medicine, so I don't think you can do that in the US.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
79 months ago

If Apple bought ARM, they would just find a way of making their products even more locked down.
How profoundly you misunderstand things. Apple doesn't want to buy ARM because they'd likely then be forced to license their own innovations. Every innovation they made to an ARM chip would result in a lawsuit because, as owners... well the rest should be obvious.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Spock Avatar
79 months ago

What stops another company from buying ARM and then quadrupling (or more) the licensing fees? What alternatives would Apple have at that point?
Maybe they could go back to PowerPC and we could finally get that PowerBook G5 🤔
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Seoras Avatar
79 months ago
I wonder if SoftBank timed this "for sale" talk to coincide with Apple's moving MacOS to ARM announcement in the hope of getting them to seriously consider buying them out?
I can think of several companies I'd rather not see taking control of ARM who'd love to use ownership to make life difficult for Apple. Yes, yes, "regulatory oversight and requirements that would accompany such a deal" should make it safe but then again...
Imagine Qualcomm owning ARM? That couldn't be good for anyone.
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)

🔗 Related Apple News & Rumors

Stay updated with the latest Apple ecosystem news and verified rumors