Apple Shipped 2.5 Million iPhones in China in March, Rebounding Slightly From February Slump - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple Shipped 2.5 Million iPhones in China in March, Rebounding Slightly From February Slump

by

Apple shipped around 2.5 million iPhones in China last month, rebounding slightly after one of its worst months in the country on record (via Reuters).

iphone 11 china
Apple sold fewer than 500,000 iPhones in February amid curbs on travel and transport, amounting to an almost 60 percent slump in iPhone sales.

Mobile phone companies in general are hoping to see demand recover in China, where restrictions on movement have recently eased. Many are looking to increase sales in the country as a way to cushion declines in overseas markets in the coming months.

Meanwhile, multiple third-party resellers in China have been offering discounts on Apple's iPhone 11 lineup in an attempt to bolster demand during a time when consumer confidence and spending is lower.

Chinese resellers offered similar discounts on iPhone XS and iPhone XR models in early 2019, shortly after Apple lowered its revenue guidance for the first quarter of its 2019 fiscal year due to fewer iPhone upgrades than it had anticipated.

Tag: China

Top Rated Comments

dotnet Avatar
82 months ago
A doubling of the pre-60%-slump figure (1.25M) is a slight rebound?
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
82 months ago
Yet that exact opposite rationale is often set forth on here when competitors cite shipment data. As though there are warehouses full of unsold Galaxy phones.


From shipping 500k to shipping 2.5 million is still a 4x increase. Stores don’t submit orders and reorders if they’re not selling product. No one wants to sit on inventory.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Charles Cohen Avatar
82 months ago
If Apple keep making money in these F'ed times they better be giving back in a big way. If people keep dying they inadvertently wont have customers.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Abazigal Avatar
82 months ago
Yet that exact opposite rationale is often set forth on here when competitors cite shipment data. As though there are warehouses full of unsold Galaxy phones.
The issue here is that different vendors interpret and report shipment data differently.

For Apple, units shipped equate units actually sold (or at least very close to it). This works because Apple tends to have more insight into their sales volume, thanks to their Apple stores and stronger relationship with retailers. Not to mention Apple controls the underlying OS, so they will know when a new device has been activated (implying it has been sold).

For Samsung, they are strong at distribution, in that they are able to quickly push out a new product to many countries in short order. However, the problem is that they often have little clue on how many of their smartphones have been bought by consumers, because they are reliant on mobile carriers for sales data.

We see this in the way Samsung kept revising their sales number of galaxy folds downwards, from 1 million, to 400-500 thousand, and I am betting the final number is probably less than 200 thousand. The reason for this is simple - Samsung simply has no idea.

So Samsung knows very well how many phones they have produced (why wouldn’t they), which equates to number shipped, but not so much about how many phones have actually been purchased by consumers. For all we know, they really could be sitting in a warehouse somewhere.

That’s the difference. The lack of a common standard when it comes to reporting units shipped. For Apple, units shipped - units sold. For Samsung, not necessarily.

These companies care Zero about anyone who posts here so why some have some kind of bizarre need to defend multi billion dollar companies...is beyond weird.
My rationale is very simple.

Right is right, even if it means I am speaking up in favour of a soulless, faceless company or somebody that I don’t like.

Wrong is wrong, even if the subject in question is my good friend.

I speak up for Apple (most of the time) not because I have some uncontrollable urge to defend a trillion-dollar company or that I am in their pocket (I can only say ‘I wish’), but because I simply feel that their arguments don’t hold water.

If your friend or family member were to share a piece of fake news via WhatsApp or try to perpetuate an erroneous piece of information (like using toothpaste to soothe a burn), you would point that out. I am just doing the same when it comes to any discussion here on Apple. Arguments are made, I happen to not agree with them based on my own understanding of how Apple works, and so I speak up.
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
PickUrPoison Avatar
82 months ago

These companies care Zero about anyone who posts here so why some have some kind of bizarre need to defend multi billion dollar companies...is beyond weird.
Yes, Apple has an incredibly high rate of customer satisfaction. Yes, Apple elicits a tremendous amount of passion and loyalty from their customers. And yes, that seems to infuriate customers of competing products.

Oh well, they’ll live. With a lot of anger, frustration and upset, sure... but they’ll live 🤷‍♂️
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)
PickUrPoison Avatar
82 months ago

Yet that exact opposite rationale is often set forth on here when competitors cite shipment data. As though there are warehouses full of unsold Galaxy phones.
I can’t speak for other posters or any particular competitor’s practices, though some companies have been known to stuff the channel (with product that later gets rebated after being sold in “two-fer” deals).

But I haven’t seen anyone arguing about overstated android shipments for years. I do have hundreds of trolls blocked though, so I might’ve missed those posts. Feel free to link them and I’ll comment.
Score: 2 Votes (Like | Disagree)

Popular Stories

apple silicon feature joeblue

Apple Begins Testing Controversial Chinese Memory Chips

Wednesday July 8, 2026 7:18 am PDT by
Apple is testing DRAM memory chips from China's state-backed ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), according to a new report from the Financial Times. Last week, it emerged that Apple was in discussions with CXMT and fellow Chinese chipmaker Yangtze Memory Technologies (YMTC) about sourcing memory, with no deal finalized. The new details suggest Apple has since progressed to qualifying CXMT's ...
iphone 17 lineup

iPhone 17 Pricing Helped Apple Buck China's Q2 Smartphone Decline

Tuesday July 14, 2026 4:26 am PDT by
Apple grew iPhone shipments in China by 24.4 percent year over year in the second quarter of 2026, making it the fastest-growing smartphone brand in a market that shrank overall, according to preliminary figures released today by research firm IDC. Total shipments in China fell 4.3 percent to roughly 66 million units, amounting to a fifth consecutive quarter of decline. Apple and Huawei were ...
apple intelligence black

Apple Intelligence Finally Cleared to Launch in China

Wednesday July 15, 2026 4:25 am PDT by
Apple Intelligence has been approved by Chinese regulators, opening the door for the AI system to reach iPhones in the country for the first time. Reuters reports that China's Cyberspace Administration registered Apple's on-device generative AI service this week, putting it on a list of newly cleared providers that also includes homegrown systems from Chinese phone makers. An unnamed...

🔗 Related Apple News & Rumors

Stay updated with the latest Apple ecosystem news and verified rumors